Xage ZTRA/SRA Competitors Comparison

Download Guide

XONA vs. Xage ZTRA/SRA

A comparison of the XONA Critical System Gateway (CSG) to Xage Zero Trust Remote Access (ZTRA) highlights the difference between a self-contained and hardened secure user access solution for OT/CI, versus one that requires implementation of multiple software components that are installed on a VM, the Xage Cloud, 3rd-party hardware, or an appliance.

The need for technology that can support secure user access has expanded to embrace the users responsible for managing critical infrastructure1 (CI), and the operational technologies (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS) that enable them to function. Yet, few of the solutions available are purpose-built for OT, with the need for simplicity, and an ability to address OT-specific regulatory compliance requirements, such as ISA99/IEC 62443, NERC-CIP, NIST SP 800-27, NIST 800-53, and TSA SD02C. In fact, while many solutions exist for workers to securely access a network, too often they continue to use legacy access solutions that either inject more cyber risk into OT environments, and/or are too complex to deploy and maintain.

Download a detailed breakdown comparing both solutions in the XONA vs. Xage ZTRA comparison guide.

Operational Cost & Complexity

Xage ZTRA

Purpose-built for OT and Critical Infrastructure (CI)

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Good
Simple to deploy. Intuitive to use. Set and forget.

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Good
Frictionless 3rd-party access. Nothing required aside from a device with a modern browser supporting HTTPS.

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Deployment – Easy to Deploy

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Software must be staged on hardware, VM, or cloud

XONA Systems

Not Applicable

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Network/Firewall modifications required

XONA Systems

Not Applicable

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Agent (vendor) required

XONA Systems

Not Applicable

Xage ZTRA

Not Applicable
User/operator must install proprietary client application for full solution functionality

XONA Systems

Not Applicable

Xage ZTRA

Not Applicable
Time required to install

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Usability

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Manageability

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Network Complexity

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Risk of losing access to OT Asset

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Worst
Zero Trust Approach

Xage ZTRA

Authentication (e.g., 1FA, 2FA/MFA, SAML 2.0)

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Authorization – Enforces least privilege

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
User access is limited to specific OT/CI systems

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
User access is limited to specifics dates and times

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Cybersecurity

Xage ZTRA

Data Stream Protection

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Secure File Transfer

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
OT Protocol Isolation

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Good
Risk Introduced based on external dependencies

XONA Systems

Not Applicable

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Key Features & Functionality

Xage ZTRA

User/Operator Session Monitoring

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
User/Operator Session Recording (video)

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Compliance support for key OT regulations such as ISA99/IEC 62443, NERC-CIP, NIST 800-53, and TSA SD02C

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
High Availability Option

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Concerning
Log Management Integrations (e.g., SIEM, etc.)

XONA Systems

Best

Xage ZTRA

Best
Incident Management Integrations

XONA Systems

Good

Xage ZTRA

Good

Best Worst

Best
Good
Concerning
Worst
Not Applicable

Conclusion

In evaluating secure user access solutions for OT/CI, it’s important that the solution be flexible enough to address the operational needs and constraints of the environment into which it will be deployed, supports a zero-trust authentication and authorization model, and brings a high degree of security to the OT environment into which it needs to connect.

From initial deployment to ongoing maintenance, Xage ZTRA has significantly more complexity and potential points of compromise and failure compared to the XONA CSG. It is the reason that Xage introduced a cloud-based version of their solution as the on-premises solution proved to be difficult to configure and maintain.

In contrast, the XONA Critical System Gateway (CSG) enables frictionless employee, contractor, and/or vendor access that’s purpose-built for operational technology (OT) and critical infrastructure (CI).

The CSG is the definition of simplicity and can be deployed in less than an hour. It’s approach to data stream protection and protocol isolation mitigates the risk of connecting to a protected OT network from an unprotected network, and eliminates common attack vectors, while reducing the overall attack surface. It also enables compliance with OT-specific regulations such as ISA99/IEC 62443, NERC-CIP, NIST SP 800-27, NIST 800-53, and TSA SD02C.

XONA CSG is your secure portal into the cyber-physical world and enables critical operations to happen from anywhere with total confidence and trust.

1 https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors

All company and product names, logos, trademarks, service marks and branding are the property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this document are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement or criticism. The information included in this document/web page was gathered from publicly available sources and based on our opinion from our research and technical evaluation. This document is intended for general informational purposes.